On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 07:42 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> On 19/12/2019 20:13, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>
> snip...
>
> > >
> > > Going on this & the similar Amazon fix, I'd say we should backport
> > > JDK-8193255 & JDK-8225392 first. The previous updates which alter a
> > > binary file h
On 19/12/2019 20:13, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
snip...
>>>
>>
>> Going on this & the similar Amazon fix, I'd say we should backport
>> JDK-8193255 & JDK-8225392 first. The previous updates which alter a
>> binary file have been pretty much unreviewable and, if there's a better
>> solution to that,
ev On Behalf Of
> Severin Gehwolf
> Sent: Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2019 21:14
> To: Andrew John Hughes ; jdk8u-dev [email protected]>
> Cc: security-dev
> Subject: Re: [8u] RFR: 8232019: Add LuxTrust certificate updates to the
> existing root program
>
> Hi Andrew,
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 19:29 +, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> On 17/12/2019 19:30, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could I please get a review of this OpenJDK 8u backport of 8232019. The
> > JDK 11 patch did not apply cleanly for a couple of reasons:
> >
> >1. 8u still
On 17/12/2019 19:30, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I please get a review of this OpenJDK 8u backport of 8232019. The
> JDK 11 patch did not apply cleanly for a couple of reasons:
>
>1. 8u still has the binary blob for cacerts (JDK-8193255 not
> backported, yet). Instead, I've
-Original Message-
> From: jdk8u-dev On Behalf Of
> Severin Gehwolf
> Sent: Dienstag, 17. Dezember 2019 20:30
> To: jdk8u-dev
> Cc: security-dev
> Subject: [8u] RFR: 8232019: Add LuxTrust certificate updates to the existing
> root program
>
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
Could I please get a review of this OpenJDK 8u backport of 8232019. The
JDK 11 patch did not apply cleanly for a couple of reasons:
1. 8u still has the binary blob for cacerts (JDK-8193255 not
backported, yet). Instead, I've updated to the revision in jdk11u,
performed a build
