This email is about the idea to introduce in JDK 9 a fully fledged TLS
Extensions API.
Adding ALPN [0] support to JDK 9 requires, differently from other TLS
extensions, to provide application code that will be run in the
context of the TLS implementation, rather than just values such as
booleans or
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the question is, what is a extension API actually helping with: the JSSE
> implementation is slow to adopt to typical advances in TLS browser
> "wars". While this is not so bad as nobody implements a Web Browser in
> Java a
9 a fully fledged
TLS Extensions API.
Adding ALPN [0] support to JDK 9 requires, differently from other
TLS extensions, to provide application code that will be run in the
context of the TLS implementation, rather than just values such as
booleans or strings.
That's going to be interesting
> >> This email is about the idea to introduce in JDK 9 a fully fledged
> >> TLS Extensions API.
> >>
> >> Adding ALPN [0] support to JDK 9 requires, differently from other
> >> TLS extensions, to provide application code that will be run in the
> >
On 11/10/2014 07:28 AM, Simone Bordet wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 11/07/2014 02:06 PM, Simone Bordet wrote:
This email is about the idea to introduce in JDK 9 a fully fledged TLS
Extensions API.
Adding ALPN [0] support to JDK 9 requires, differently
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/07/2014 02:06 PM, Simone Bordet wrote:
>
>> This email is about the idea to introduce in JDK 9 a fully fledged TLS
>> Extensions API.
>>
>> Adding ALPN [0] support to JDK 9 requires, differently fr
On 11/07/2014 02:06 PM, Simone Bordet wrote:
This email is about the idea to introduce in JDK 9 a fully fledged TLS
Extensions API.
Adding ALPN [0] support to JDK 9 requires, differently from other TLS
extensions, to provide application code that will be run in the
context of the TLS
Hi,
I was writing the email about the ALPN API proposal when I realized
that it would have been better to split the arguments in different
emails.
This email is about the idea to introduce in JDK 9 a fully fledged TLS
Extensions API.
Adding ALPN [0] support to JDK 9 requires, differently from
