Hi Max,
for those sections I have dropped I consider them resovled or some
action wil be taken from you with a followup webrev and a JBS issue.
A general note on trace output: I found it really helpful, don't remove it!
Am 2020-04-21 um 15:36 schrieb Weijun Wang:
On Apr 2, 2020, at 12:21
> On Apr 2, 2020, at 12:21 AM, Osipov, Michael
> wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> at last I took some time to evaluate you SSPI bridge. This is part one.
> Interaction evaluation will follow in a second email.
>
> Assumptions:
> * All methods, objects behave the same as with JGSS
> * AcceptSecurityC
Thanks, no need to hurry. Take your time. I just don't want it to be
forgotten.
Michael
Am 2020-04-16 um 02:53 schrieb Weijun Wang:
Sorry, not yet. Still busy on something else.
I'll look into it today and tomorrow.
Thanks,
Max
On Apr 16, 2020, at 5:17 AM, Osipov, Michael wrote:
Max,
di
Sorry, not yet. Still busy on something else.
I'll look into it today and tomorrow.
Thanks,
Max
> On Apr 16, 2020, at 5:17 AM, Osipov, Michael
> wrote:
>
> Max,
>
> did you get a chance to go through the comments? I'd like to start review 2
> (interaction) somewhere next week, but would lik
Max,
did you get a chance to go through the comments? I'd like to start
review 2 (interaction) somewhere next week, but would like to sort this
one out first.
Michael
Am 2020-04-02 um 03:47 schrieb Weijun Wang:
I'll read this carefully, thanks a lot for the comments.
--Max
On Apr 2, 2020
Hi Max,
at last I took some time to evaluate you SSPI bridge. This is part one.
Interaction evaluation will follow in a second email.
Assumptions:
* All methods, objects behave the same as with JGSS
* AcceptSecurityContext is not implemented so should everything
associated with it fail (GSSEx
