Re: FYI.... Fwd: Re: [9] RFR:JDK-8076359:Test Task: Develop new tests for Leverage CPU Instructions for GHASH and RSA

2015-11-10 Thread Sean Mullan
Looks good. Thanks, Sean On 11/10/2015 03:36 AM, Tim Du wrote: Hi Sean: Thanks for reviewing the codes. Updated them follow your comments, see http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/tim/8076359/webrev.02/ ,please help to review them again. Regards Tim On 11/10/2015 8:18 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: Cou

Re: FYI.... Fwd: Re: [9] RFR:JDK-8076359:Test Task: Develop new tests for Leverage CPU Instructions for GHASH and RSA

2015-11-10 Thread Tim Du
Hi Sean: Thanks for reviewing the codes. Updated them follow your comments, see http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~fyuan/tim/8076359/webrev.02/ ,please help to review them again. Regards Tim On 11/10/2015 8:18 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: Couple of comments: - SolarisProviderTest is too generic for me.

Re: FYI.... Fwd: Re: [9] RFR:JDK-8076359:Test Task: Develop new tests for Leverage CPU Instructions for GHASH and RSA

2015-11-09 Thread Sean Mullan
Couple of comments: - SolarisProviderTest is too generic for me. I would call this "PreferredProviderTest". Also, that way it can be enhanced over time if we add preferred providers for other OSes. - In the error messages: s/Get/Got/ s/Return/Returned/ - Similarly, "SecurityPropertyNegative