Thanks for the review Tony. Yes - no problems with tests. Copyright
updated and changeset pushed.
regards,
Sean.
On 03/08/2018 05:23, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
Looks good. Only comment is update the copyright year. No need to regenerate a
webrev. Assuming it passes all the tests I say it’s rea
Looks good. Only comment is update the copyright year. No need to regenerate a
webrev. Assuming it passes all the tests I say it’s ready to push.
Tony
> On Aug 2, 2018, at 5:15 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
>
> Thanks Tony. I was asked off thread to add some comments to help code
> maintenance also
Thanks Tony. I was asked off thread to add some comments to help code
maintenance also.
webrev updated. Hope we're nearly ready to push now.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8207775.v4/webrev/
regards,
Sean.
On 01/08/2018 18:41, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
That looks fine to me.
Tony
That looks fine to me.
Tony
On 08/01/2018 08:39 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Thanks again for review Tony. I think you raise a good point and should
give some performance gain.
for line 676: maybe this :
byte[] copy = Arrays.copyOf(output, len);
if (decrypting)
Thanks again for review Tony. I think you raise a good point and should
give some performance gain.
for line 676: maybe this :
byte[] copy = Arrays.copyOf(output, len);
if (decrypting) {
Arrays.fill(output, (byte) 0x00);
}
My only comment is if it makes sense to have the change at 676 to also
only null out on decrypt?
Otherwise I'm fine with the changes
Tony
On 07/31/2018 02:04 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
Thanks for review Tony. Comments inline..
On 27/07/18 21:02, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
If we are going to ad
Thanks for review Tony. Comments inline..
On 27/07/18 21:02, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
If we are going to add more, here are two more ton consider:
- It looks like there is another Arrays.copyOf() on doFinal() line 851
Good point.
- doFinal()
at line 897 there might be something that should be
If we are going to add more, here are two more ton consider:
- It looks like there is another Arrays.copyOf() on doFinal() line 851
- doFinal() at line 897 there might be something that should be done
with 'buffer'. In particular as a result of line 963's arraycopy().
Tony
On 07/27/2018 08:
Thanks Tony. If it's alright with you, I'd like to make one more edit
for this change.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8207775.v2/webrev/
There's a condition where we can null out an array early if we're
returning a copy. See lines 671-683
Regards,
Sean.
On 26/07/18 17:42, Anthon
On 07/26/2018 07:36 AM, Seán Coffey wrote:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207775
Simple enough fix to null out some internal buffers once they're no
longer required.
webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8207775/webrev/
regards,
Sean.
that looks fine..
Tony
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8207775
Simple enough fix to null out some internal buffers once they're no
longer required.
webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coffeys/webrev.8207775/webrev/
regards,
Sean.
11 matches
Mail list logo
