On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 20:05:19 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> Thank you, @valeriepeng. I am not sure what is the review policy for this
>> code, should I wait for another reviewer?
>
> One reviewer is good enough. You can go ahead and integrate. Thanks~
Got it, thanks!
-
PR: https://gi
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 06:46:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Changes look good.
>
> Thank you, @valeriepeng. I am not sure what is the review policy for this
> code, should I wait for another reviewer?
One reviewer is good enough. You can go ahead and integrate. Thanks~
-
PR: http
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 00:14:55 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> Current `sun/security/provider/SHA2` implementation is written with lots of
>> small method invocations on the fastpath in `implCompress0`. Normally it
>> does not matter much, because compilers are able to inline through it, and
>> then
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:29:49 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Current `sun/security/provider/SHA2` implementation is written with lots of
> small method invocations on the fastpath in `implCompress0`. Normally it does
> not matter much, because compilers are able to inline through it, and then
>
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 08:29:49 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Current `sun/security/provider/SHA2` implementation is written with lots of
> small method invocations on the fastpath in `implCompress0`. Normally it does
> not matter much, because compilers are able to inline through it, and then
>
Current `sun/security/provider/SHA2` implementation is written with lots of
small method invocations on the fastpath in `implCompress0`. Normally it does
not matter much, because compilers are able to inline through it, and then some
compilers even intrinsify the entire `implCompress0`.
But it
