Re: RFR: 8263978: Clarify why 0 argument is ignored in SecureRandom::setSeed [v2]

On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:06:56 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: >> We don't use `digest` anymore but still need to ignore the 0 argument. > > Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > typo Marked as reviewed by valeriep (Reviewer).

Re: RFR: 8263978: Clarify why 0 argument is ignored in SecureRandom::setSeed [v2]

On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:40:37 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote: >> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> typo > > src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/SecureRandom.java line 739: > >> 737: * to actually do any

Re: RFR: 8263978: Clarify why 0 argument is ignored in SecureRandom::setSeed [v2]

On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:06:56 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: >> We don't use `digest` anymore but still need to ignore the 0 argument. > > Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > typo

Re: RFR: 8263978: Clarify why 0 argument is ignored in SecureRandom::setSeed [v2]

> We don't use `digest` anymore but still need to ignore the 0 argument. Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: typo - Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3124/files - new: