On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:42:58 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Not a PKCS11 expert, but does a "digest-specific PSS signature mechanism"
> needs `setParameter` anymore? Or, must it be the same as the existing
> parameters dictated by the specified digest?
Previously when PSS support is added, the NSS l
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:20:30 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Can someone help reviewing this trivial one-line fix? The assert check in
> CK_MECHANISM.java is too strict and fail unexpectedly when digest-specific
> PSS signature mechanisms are supported by the underlying PKCS#11 library. The
> fix is
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:20:30 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Can someone help reviewing this trivial one-line fix? The assert check in
> CK_MECHANISM.java is too strict and fail unexpectedly when digest-specific
> PSS signature mechanisms are supported by the underlying PKCS#11 library. The
> fix is
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 01:20:30 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Can someone help reviewing this trivial one-line fix? The assert check in
> CK_MECHANISM.java is too strict and fail unexpectedly when digest-specific
> PSS signature mechanisms are supported by the underlying PKCS#11 library. The
> fix is
Can someone help reviewing this trivial one-line fix? The assert check in
CK_MECHANISM.java is too strict and fail unexpectedly when digest-specific PSS
signature mechanisms are supported by the underlying PKCS#11 library. The fix
is to remove this assert check. No new regression test added with
