> Please review these changes to update the security libraries to use sealed
> classes. See JEP 409 for more details on sealed classes.
>
> No CSR is required as all the changes are to internal classes. A few classes
> that did not have subclasses were simply marked final instead of sealed.
Sea
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 20:07:32 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Please review these changes to update the security libraries to use sealed
>> classes. See JEP 409 for more details on sealed classes.
>>
>> No CSR is required as all the changes are to internal classes. A few classes
>> that did not have
> Please review these changes to update the security libraries to use sealed
> classes. See JEP 409 for more details on sealed classes.
>
> No CSR is required as all the changes are to internal classes. A few classes
> that did not have subclasses were simply marked final instead of sealed.
Sea
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:11:27 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Sean Mullan has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Make some classes package-private instead of sealed.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/rsa/RSASignature.java li
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 16:17:19 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> It looks `KrbTgsRep.java`, `Krb5ProxyCredential.java`, `Builder.java`,
> `Vertex.java`, `Validator.java`, and `RSAKeyPairGenerator.java` can all be
> made package private.
Good point, although I would prefer to leave `Validator` as public f
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:40:37 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please review these changes to update the security libraries to use sealed
> classes. See JEP 409 for more details on sealed classes.
>
> No CSR is required as all the changes are to internal classes. A few classes
> that did not have subcl
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:40:37 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please review these changes to update the security libraries to use sealed
> classes. See JEP 409 for more details on sealed classes.
>
> No CSR is required as all the changes are to internal classes. A few classes
> that did not have subcl
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:40:37 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please review these changes to update the security libraries to use sealed
> classes. See JEP 409 for more details on sealed classes.
>
> No CSR is required as all the changes are to internal classes. A few classes
> that did not have subcl
Please review these changes to update the security libraries to use sealed
classes. See JEP 409 for more details on sealed classes.
No CSR is required as all the changes are to internal classes. A few classes
that did not have subclasses were simply marked final instead of sealed.
-