Looks fine to me.
The old code looks a little bit hard to understand to me.
Xuelei
On 7/8/2014 9:15 PM, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Please review my fix for JDK-8049244:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/8049244/webrev.00/
>
> This is a direct port of the corresponding fix from Apach
Please review my fix for JDK-8049244:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mullan/webrevs/8049244/webrev.00/
This is a direct port of the corresponding fix from Apache Santuario. No
regression test since this is a performance related fix. However, the
customer that reported this to the Apache Santu
