On 07/09/2014 12:31 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Webrev updated at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8049480/webrev.01/.
Looks good to me.
--Sean
On Jul 8, 2014, at 23:15, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> Looks fine to me.
>
> It would be nice to extend AlgorithmId.getStandardDigestName() to
> AlgorithmId.getStandardName() in the future.
The JDK8 version of fix for 7180907 already had AlgorithmId.getName() returning
the standard one.
--Max
>
> X
Webrev updated at phttp://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8049480/webrev.01/.
Thanks
Max
On Jul 9, 2014, at 0:45, Sean Mullan wrote:
> On 07/08/2014 10:37 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
>> Please review the jdk7u-only code change at
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8049480/webrev.00/
>>
>> The re
On 07/08/2014 10:37 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Please review the jdk7u-only code change at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8049480/webrev.00/
The reason is that the jdk7u version [1] of fix for JDK-8049480 is just a hack and not as
powerful as its jdk8 sibling [2] and now I'll have to apply
Looks fine to me.
It would be nice to extend AlgorithmId.getStandardDigestName() to
AlgorithmId.getStandardName() in the future.
Xuelei
On 7/8/2014 10:37 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
> Please review the jdk7u-only code change at
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8049480/webrev.00/
>
> The rea
Please review the jdk7u-only code change at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8049480/webrev.00/
The reason is that the jdk7u version [1] of fix for JDK-8049480 is just a hack
and not as powerful as its jdk8 sibling [2] and now I'll have to apply the
jdk7u jar signature "hack" to timestamp s
