But the "deprecation" argument is also for PolicyTool.
-Max
On 03/29/2017 07:35 AM, joe darcy wrote:
Hi Max,
Since entire classes were being covered by the annotation, I wanted to
make clear that the removal warnings in those cases were for PolicyTool
as opposed to being for something else.
T
Hi Max,
Since entire classes were being covered by the annotation, I wanted to
make clear that the removal warnings in those cases were for PolicyTool
as opposed to being for something else.
Thanks,
-Joe
On 3/28/2017 4:30 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi Joe
This looks fine to me.
One question
Hi Joe
This looks fine to me.
One question:
-@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
+@SuppressWarnings({"deprecation",
+ "removal"}) // PolicyTool
Why did you split the line to 2?
Thanks
Max
On 03/28/2017 09:09 AM, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
The jdk.security and jdk.policytool mod
Hello,
The jdk.security and jdk.policytool modules use various APIs that are
deprecated for removal. Until the types in question are actually
removed, the lint removal warnings should be suppressed in support of
having a warnings-free build. Please review the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.ja