Hi -
Looking at Valeries changes to the above made me take a closer look at
the current definitions of the various RSA key interfaces. What would be
the impact of the following changes?:
Make RSAMultiPrimePrivateCrtKeySpec extend RSAPrivateCrtKeyKeySpec
instead of RSAPrivateKeySpec. RSAMultiPrimePrivateCrtKeySpec would then
only define the RSAOtherPrimeInfo[] getOtherPrimeInfo() method.
Ditto for RSAMultiPrimePrivateCrtKey and RSAPrivateCrtKey
Move getPublicExponent() from RSAPublicKey and RSAPrivateCrtKey to RSAKey.
Ditto for the Spec versions.
I think the first two changes can be done without adverse impact and are
more correct than the current definitions.
The latter two are more problematic, but can probably be handled using
the default method mechanism.
The API documents would indicate that these functions would return null
if the values are unavailable.
Mike
