Re: The fix for JDK-806769 breaks some ldap usages.

Hi David, Thanks for reporting the issue. I filed a bug for the tracking: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8139721 Thanks, Xuelei On 9/26/2015 4:39 PM, David Black wrote: > > > On Saturday, 26 September 2015, Sean Mullan > wrote: > > JDK-806769

Re: The fix for JDK-806769 breaks some ldap usages.

On Saturday, 26 September 2015, Sean Mullan wrote: > JDK-806769 doesn't exist, can you double-check what issue you think caused > this? Looks like you are missing a digit. > > Hi Sean, hmm I don't know how I managed that ... the complete issue id is JDK-8067695. > > On 9/24/15 10:46 PM, David

Re: The fix for JDK-806769 breaks some ldap usages.

JDK-806769 doesn't exist, can you double-check what issue you think caused this? Looks like you are missing a digit. Thanks, Sean On 9/24/15 10:46 PM, David Black wrote: As I do not have an account on https://bugs.openjdk.java.net, yes I have submitted a standard oracle java bug report, I thou

The fix for JDK-806769 breaks some ldap usages.

As I do not have an account on https://bugs.openjdk.java.net, yes I have submitted a standard oracle java bug report, I thought it might be of interest to those on this mailing list to forward information on how some java ldap users since the JDK-806769 fix may encounter invalid ldaps hostname issu