[security-dev 01193]: hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 2 new changesets

2009-09-09 Thread sean . mullan
Changeset: 8252729d51a3 Author:mullan Date: 2009-09-09 09:54 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/8252729d51a3 6745437: Add option to only check revocation of end-entity certificate in a chain of certificates 6869739: Cannot check revocation of single certificate w

[security-dev 01194]: PKCS11 and Win X64?

2009-09-09 Thread Michael StJohns
Any idea why the win x64 jdk and jre 6 builds (1.6.0_16) are shipping without the sunpkcs11.jar? The only posted bug I see on this is from 1.5 ( 6571044) and its marked as resolved. I'm in the process of moving over to an x64 system and this is a prelim to doing an x64 build of jdk6. Its po

[security-dev 01195]: Re: 6840752: Provide out-of-the-box support for ECC algorithms

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent Ryan
Hello Andrew, I realize that you, along with others in the Linux community, are less than satisfied with the changeset to provide out-of-the-box support for ECC algorithms. As I mentioned earlier, we were quite constrained in what we could openly discuss before we pushed. However, now that we ha

[security-dev 01196]: hg: jdk7/tl/jdk: 6737212: Fixed javadoc warning messages in RowSet classes

2009-09-09 Thread lance . andersen
Changeset: f1eb4c28b313 Author:lancea Date: 2009-09-09 20:15 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/f1eb4c28b313 6737212: Fixed javadoc warning messages in RowSet classes Reviewed-by: darcy ! src/share/classes/com/sun/rowset/JdbcRowSetResourceBundle.java ! src/share/

[security-dev 01197]: Re: 6840752: Provide out-of-the-box support for ECC algorithms

2009-09-09 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2009/9/9 Vincent Ryan : > Hello Andrew, > > I realize that you, along with others in the Linux community, are less > than satisfied with the changeset to provide out-of-the-box support for > ECC algorithms. > > As I mentioned earlier, we were quite constrained in what we could > openly discuss befo

[security-dev 01198]: Re: PKCS11 and Win X64?

2009-09-09 Thread Brad Wetmore
Hi Michael, In JDK6, the primary reason we did not ship a win64 version of the SunPKCS11 provider is that we did not have access to any PKCS#11 implementation to test with on win64. We did not want to ship something that could not be tested at all and could potentially be DOA. I looked for a

[security-dev 01199]: Re: PKCS11 and Win X64?

2009-09-09 Thread Michael StJohns
That makes sense - but was a surprise. Let me see if I can get one of the companies I work with to contribute their simulator - not to be shipped, but to be tested against. The simulator runs at 32bits, but the pkcs11 library that talks to the simulator has builds for win 32/64 linux 32/64 and