On 28/01/2013 09:03, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Your opinion? I still like to keep my changes.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8006564/webrev.00/
>
> -Max
>
I don't like it because it hacks the JDK under test with -Xbootclasspath/p.
-Alan.
I cannot think of a better way to simulate jdk6 behavior without calling
jdk6.
Without this hack, the forward compatibility check part cannot be
tested. Maybe I can add this part to the jdk6 repo?
Thanks
Max
On 01/29/2013 05:59 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 28/01/2013 09:03, Weijun Wang wrote:
>
On 29/01/2013 10:21, Weijun Wang wrote:
> I cannot think of a better way to simulate jdk6 behavior without calling
> jdk6.
>
> Without this hack, the forward compatibility check part cannot be
> tested. Maybe I can add this part to the jdk6 repo?
>
I think the type of interop that you attempting to
Changeset: a343d280bd8c
Author:jfranck
Date: 2013-01-29 10:32 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a343d280bd8c
8004698: Implement Core Reflection for Type Annotations
Reviewed-by: darcy
! src/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java
! src/share/classes/java/lang/System.
