Re: RFR 8046002: Move Ucrypto to the open jdk repo

2014-10-14 Thread Sean Mullan
You should change the @since tags to 1.9 since this is its first inclusion in OpenJDK. Looks good otherwise. --Sean On 10/13/2014 07:54 PM, Valerie Peng wrote: Hi, Sean, Could you please review the changes for 8046002: Move Ucrypto to the open jdk repo? Once you reviewed it, I will request a

Re: apple.security.KeychainStore does not load private key (when called from javaws)

2014-10-14 Thread Florian Bruckner (3kraft)
Hi Vincent, it seems we've stalled on this somewhere. What do I need to do to have the patch accepted? regards, Florian On 21.08.14 11:28, Vincent Ryan wrote: Hello Florian, I can sponsor this changeset and attribute the fix to you. On 21 Aug 2014, at 09:52, Florian Bruckner (3kraft) w

Re: apple.security.KeychainStore does not load private key (when called from javaws)

2014-10-14 Thread Vincent Ryan
I’m the blocker. I’ll try to get your changset pushed by the end of this week. On 14 Oct 2014, at 13:24, Florian Bruckner (3kraft) wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > it seems we've stalled on this somewhere. > > What do I need to do to have the patch accepted? > > regards, > > Florian > > > On 21.

[Updated] RFR: JDK-8032573

2014-10-14 Thread Jamil Nimeh
Hello all, this is another update to JDK-8032573. This link adds the JDK 8 backport. It's pretty much the same fix, with the addition of moving a couple StringBuffers to StringBuilders. I'm also still looking for a yea/nay on the JDK 9 proposed fix as well. JDK 9 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.j

Re: [Updated] RFR: JDK-8032573

2014-10-14 Thread Wang Weijun
Jamil Both code changes look fine. One suggestion: you might want to mention that the first character in invalidcert.pem in the test was "M". It is modified to "X" to be invalid. This would help maintainers understand where it comes from. Thanks Max On Oct 15, 2014, at 1:42, Jamil Nimeh wrot

Re: [Updated] RFR: JDK-8032573

2014-10-14 Thread Jamil Nimeh
Thank you for the reviews and I will go make the comment changes as you suggest. --Jamil On 10/14/2014 7:11 PM, Wang Weijun wrote: Jamil Both code changes look fine. One suggestion: you might want to mention that the first character in invalidcert.pem in the test was "M". It is modified to

[Updated] RFR: JDK-8032573

2014-10-14 Thread Jamil Nimeh
Okay, one more round. This has the comment changes Max asked for and some additional cleanup of NetBeans warnings in the test code. No changes were made to X509Factory.java. JDK 8: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8057141/webrev.02 JDK 9: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8032573/webr