> On Nov 15, 2014, at 09:25, Valerie Peng wrote:
>
> Max,
>
> Most looks fine, just some questions.
>
> - Kinit.java: line 56, it should be "sun.security.krb5.internal.tools.Kinit"?
Correct.
> - Kinit.java: for the switch block from 135 - 142: add a default case to
> catch illegal values?
The vote for Anthony Scarpino [1] is now closed.
Yes: 7
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0
According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is sufficient
to approve the nomination.
Sean Mullan
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2014-November/011378.html
The default value 0 for the "renew_lifetime" is documented in MIT's
Kerberos conf documentation.
http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-devel/doc/admin/conf_files/krb5_conf.html
However, I am not sure how this 0 value should be interpreted/handled.
Valerie
On 11/17/2014 12:23 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2014, at 07:43, Valerie Peng wrote:
>
>
> The default value 0 for the "renew_lifetime" is documented in MIT's Kerberos
> conf documentation.
> http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-devel/doc/admin/conf_files/krb5_conf.html
> However, I am not sure how this 0 value should be interprete
Re-request for code review at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8061253/webrev.01/
Most are still spec changes, with only one code change in KerberosTicket.java
where KerberosPrincipal.toString() is changed to KerberosPrincipal.getName().
This is also because the spec for getName() is more s
