On 1/19/17 9:20 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
On 01/19/2017 10:45 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
One more:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173018
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076535)
Deprecate the com.sun.jarsigner package
The `com.sun.jarsigner` package is being deprecated. This
On 1/19/17 9:20 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Another one:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173035
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029904)
Remove com.sun.security.auth.callback.DialogCallbackHandler
`com.sun.security.auth.callback.DialogCallbackHandler` has been
removed in JDK
Could I get a quick code review for this simple fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174837?:
diff --git
a/src/jdk.jartool/share/classes/com/sun/jarsigner/ContentSigner.java
b/src/jdk.jartool/share/classes/com/sun/jarsigner/ContentSigner.java
--- a/src/jdk.jartool/share/classes/c
Your fix looks fine. Minor nit with the copyright header in ContentSigner.java:
it’s missing a comma after ‘2017’.
Thanks.
> On 13 Feb 2017, at 16:25, Sean Mullan wrote:
>
> Could I get a quick code review for this simple fix for
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174837?:
>
> diff
Hi,
I need a quick review on a simple certpath config change.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8174849/webrev/
thanks
Tony
Looks fine. You'll need to add a noreg label to the bug though.
--Sean
On 2/13/17 4:47 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
Hi,
I need a quick review on a simple certpath config change.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8174849/webrev/
thanks
Tony
javax/net/ssl/DTLS/RespondToRetransmit.java
This test has been observed to fail intermittently with relatively high
frequency at macosx (JDK-8169086). Until issue resolved, test should be
problem listed for this platform.
Also please note that issue originally reported in JDK-8170492.
JDK-81
Please take a review at
cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8168410/webrev.00
JDK-8164705 introduced a compatibility layer to make sure that when
FilePermission on "/pwd/x" is granted you can still read "x". The
compatibility layer has 2 parts:
1. Inside our own default policy provider.
2. Insi
Change looks fine.
Thanks
Max
On 02/14/2017 12:25 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Could I get a quick code review for this simple fix for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174837?:
diff --git
a/src/jdk.jartool/share/classes/com/sun/jarsigner/ContentSigner.java
b/src/jdk.jartool/share/classes/co
looks fine to me. Thanks!
Xuelei
> On Feb 13, 2017, at 6:48 PM, Amy Lu wrote:
>
> javax/net/ssl/DTLS/RespondToRetransmit.java
>
> This test has been observed to fail intermittently with relatively high
> frequency at macosx (JDK-8169086). Until issue resolved, test should be
> problem liste
Hello,
The bug does not explain why. I would understand to completely deny SHA1 (I.e.
Unconditionally), but allowing it seems strange, especially without a
justification.
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:57 PM +0100, "Anthony Scarpino"
wrote:
11 matches
Mail list logo