From a build point of view this looks good.
/Erik
On 2017-09-06 06:17, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi All
Please review the change, which spans to root, jdk and langtools repos.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8148371/
I've searched for the "policytool" word in the whole jdk10/jdk10 forests,
On 06/09/2017 05:17, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi All
Please review the change, which spans to root, jdk and langtools repos.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8148371/
I've searched for the "policytool" word in the whole jdk10/jdk10 forests,
removed all files having the word inside the path n
The jdk changes look fine to me.
--Sean
On 9/6/17 12:17 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi All
Please review the change, which spans to root, jdk and langtools repos.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8148371/
I've searched for the "policytool" word in the whole jdk10/jdk10 forests,
removed all
Please take a review at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8186884/webrev.00/
BasicProc.java is enhanced to use a native JGSS provider, and KDC.java is
enhanced to start (not use) a native KDC. For example, you would be able to
test interop among Java JGSS, native JGSS (with MIT krb5) and He
Hi,
Please review this test for checking the interop compatibility on JSSE
among different JDK releases (from 6 to 10).
It covers the cases, like handshake, data exchange, client
authentication and APLN, on all TLS versions (if possible).
And the selected TLS cipher suites are: TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_
Hi John,
Thanks for starting working on this. I believe this tool is going to be
very helpful.
Let me skip some coding comments for a while, I have a couple of
comments about the design. The main idea is that it should cover as many
cases as it can. Even if it might look a bit redundant, I b