Hi Michael,
Sorry about the late reply. I've just posted a new webrev at
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/6722928/webrev.06
Below are my replies to some of your questions.
>
>>> * Why do you redefine SEC_SUCCESS macro from sspi.h?
>>
>> Oops, I didn't realized it's a redefinition. I'll
There is been some time but I've uploaded a new webrev at
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/6722928/webrev.06
Major changes:
1. No more get expiration time from TGT, accept the one from
AcquireCredentialsHandle, which makes GSS_C_INDEFINITE.
2. KRB5_TRACE can be set to any file name. /dev/
213-217:
Previously, the set/get of both verificationResults and
verifyingProviders are synchronized. With this update, the get of
verificationResults is not out of the set synchronized block, so there
is a competition introduced. I think it would be nice to double check
the verificationResu
Hi Valerie,
Thanks for your feedback.
Here it is Webrev.02:
* http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbalao/webrevs/8220513/8220513.webrev.02/
On 4/4/19 7:31 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
> The refList field inside the SessionKeyRef is changed to use LinkedList.
> When there is a large number of P11Key objects
Hi Xuelei,
Thanks for the comments.
On 4/16/2019 8:58 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
213-217:
Previously, the set/get of both verificationResults and
verifyingProviders are synchronized. With this update, the get of
verificationResults is not out of the set synchronized block, so there
is a competit
On 4/16/2019 2:16 PM, Valerie Peng wrote:
Hi Xuelei,
Thanks for the comments.
On 4/16/2019 8:58 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
213-217:
Previously, the set/get of both verificationResults and
verifyingProviders are synchronized. With this update, the get of
verificationResults is not out of the set
Hi,
Could I get the following update reviewed?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8216326/webrev.00/
Per the Socket specification, the close of the inputstream/outputstream
should close the associated socket. The SSLSocketImpl is a sub-class of
Socket and does not follow the spec. That's
Hi Xuelei,
Besides the double semicolons on 983 and 1149, I think it looks fine.
--Jamil
On 4/16/2019 4:37 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Could I get the following update reviewed?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8216326/webrev.00/
Per the Socket specification, the close of the
inputstream
On 4/16/2019 4:51 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
Hi Xuelei,
Besides the double semicolons on 983 and 1149, I think it looks fine.
I will update accordingly. Thanks for the quick review!
Xuelei
--Jamil
On 4/16/2019 4:37 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Could I get the following update reviewed?
http