> On Jun 4, 2019, at 2:39 PM, Michael Osipov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Am 2019-06-04 um 04:09 schrieb Weijun Wang:
>> Rethinking about this. Although this sspi.cpp is included in OpenJDK, it was
>> meant to be a pure standalone DLL that has nothing to do with JNI or JVM.
>> Adding this
I uploaded an updated webrev in place. The only changes are:
1. s/SSPI_TRACE/SSPI_BRIDGE_TRACE/ in sspi.cpp
2. Several copyright year updates.
3. Remove one unused import.
Thanks,
Max
> On May 30, 2019, at 11:18 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>
> Here is the latest webrev
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java
Hi Tony,
I have some minor comments on the test.
ResumeChecksServer.java
57 static boolean clientCache = false, serverServerless = false;
Should "serverServerless" be "serverStateless"?
86 if (st.compareToIgnoreCase("stateless") == 0) {
87 serverServe
ResumeChecksServer.java
57 static boolean clientCache = false, serverServerless = false;
Should "serverServerless" be "serverStateless"?
86 if (st.compareToIgnoreCase("stateless") == 0) {
87 serverServerless = true;
88 }
89 st = Syste
On 6/4/19 4:58 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Tony,
I have some minor comments on the test.
ResumeChecksServer.java
57 static boolean clientCache = false, serverServerless = false;
Should "serverServerless" be "serverStateless"?
86 if (st.compareToIgnoreCase
On 6/4/2019 9:46 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
125 if (secondSession.getCreationTime() > secondStartTime &&
126 !clientCache && !serverServerless) {
127 throw new RuntimeException("Session was not reused");
128 }
If the session should be r
Hi,
Could I get the following update reviewed?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8224829/webrev.00/
If using one thread for closing, one thread for writing. Closing and
writing threads are synchronized in order to delivery close_notify TLS
record. There are could be race between the two
On 6/4/19 10:02 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
On 6/4/2019 9:46 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
125 if (secondSession.getCreationTime() > secondStartTime &&
126 !clientCache && !serverServerless) {
127 throw new RuntimeException("Session was not
reused");
128
Backport JBS issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224769
Backport CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224770
Original JBS issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210985
Original CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213577
Original email thread:
http://mai
Backport JBS issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224765
Backport CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224766
Original JBS issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210985
Original email thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2018-September/018168
Hi Christoph,
looks like quite some manual resolution just because of a small conflicting
change in one file.
Backport looks good, but please backport it together with JDK-8217344.
After that, ECDHKeyAgreement.java should be identical to the jdk13 version.
Best regards,
Martin
> -Original
Add
Original CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213577
On 5/24/19, 9:42 AM, "jdk-updates-dev on behalf of Hohensee, Paul"
wrote:
Backport JBS issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224765
Backport CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224766
Or
On 6/4/19 10:02 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
On 6/4/2019 9:46 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
125 if (secondSession.getCreationTime() > secondStartTime &&
126 !clientCache && !serverServerless) {
127 throw new RuntimeException("Session was not
reused");
128
Hi Tony,
On 2019/6/5 00:46, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
125 if (secondSession.getCreationTime() > secondStartTime &&
126 !clientCache && !serverServerless) {
127 throw new RuntimeException("Session was not
reused");
128 }
If the session
Hi Tony,
There are a lot of pretty good designs in the update, for example, the
cooperation of the session timeout and key rotation timeout.
My following comments are mainly about the issues I can find. Most of
them are minors.
On 6/3/2019 5:42 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
http://cr.openjd
15 matches
Mail list logo
