Hi Max,
I saw in the bug description that handling and parsing of the public key
will be resolved in a separate enhancement which is fine with me.
In addition to relaxing the PKCS8 version check to accept 1, the current
webrev does not check for the trailing bytes and its validity. Perhaps
w
Great, thanks much for the thorough review~
Valerie
On 5/15/2020 8:57 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Well done. Everything looks fine to me.
--Max
On May 16, 2020, at 5:47 AM, Valerie Peng wrote:
Hi Max,
I have updated the webrev
(http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8242151/webrev.05/) to addre
Hi,
I’d like to request a review for -
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8245151
Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hchao/8245151/webrev.00/
The change is to provide a distinct warning for jarsigner -verify command when
it detects weak timestamp digest algorithms are used (by -tsa
Updated again due to the merge with Tony's EdDSA change:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8242151/webrev.06
Added Ed25519 and Ed448 to KnownOIDs, and rest are just adjustments
accordingly.
Touched:
src/jdk.crypto.ec/share/classes/sun/security/ec/ed/EdDSAParameters.java
src/jdk.crypto.ec/
Still looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Max
> On May 19, 2020, at 5:36 AM, Valerie Peng wrote:
>
> Updated again due to the merge with Tony's EdDSA change:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8242151/webrev.06
>
> Added Ed25519 and Ed448 to KnownOIDs, and rest are just adjustments
> accordingly
Looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Max
> On May 19, 2020, at 4:05 AM, Hai-May Chao wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’d like to request a review for -
>
> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8245151
> Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hchao/8245151/webrev.00/
>
> The change is to provide a distinct w
> On May 19, 2020, at 1:41 AM, Valerie Peng wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> I saw in the bug description that handling and parsing of the public key will
> be resolved in a separate enhancement which is fine with me.
>
> In addition to relaxing the PKCS8 version check to accept 1, the current
> web