On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 13:51:04 GMT, Korov wrote:
>> Removing unused parameter `defval` in `SocketPermission.initEphemeralPorts`,
>> so the variable `PRIV_PORT_MAX` and `DEF_EPH_LOW` unused too.
>>
>> Removing unused parameter `cname` in `SocketPermission.authorizedIPv4` and
>> `SocketPermission.a
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:55:09 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
> Please review this cleanup PR which suggests we remove the package-private,
> unused and deprecated method `java.util.jar.Manifest.make72Safe`.
>
> This method was marked deprecated after a cleanup/refactoring in
> [JDK-8066619](https://
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:06:26 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
> This fixes the defect described at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>
> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
> read-only (instead of failing).
>
> Please note that permissions to use a cert
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:06:26 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
> This fixes the defect described at https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>
> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
> read-only (instead of failing).
>
> Please note that permissions to use a cert
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 00:41:15 GMT, Mat Carter wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
>> Please note that permissions to use a
> This code change adds an alternative implementation of user-based
> authorization `Subject` APIs that doesn't depend on Security Manager APIs.
> Depending on if the Security Manager is allowed, the methods store the
> current subject differently. See the spec change in the `Subject.java` file
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 16:17:14 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fix MBeanServerFileAccessController, more test in SM
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/javax/security/auth/Subject.java line
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:47:41 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fix MBeanServerFileAccessController, more test in SM
>
> test/jdk/javax/security/auth/Subject/CallAsWithScopedValue.java l
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:15:54 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fix MBeanServerFileAccessController, more test in SM
>
> test/jdk/javax/management/monitor/ThreadPoolAccTest.java line 69:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:55:09 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
> Please review this cleanup PR which suggests we remove the package-private,
> unused and deprecated method `java.util.jar.Manifest.make72Safe`.
>
> This method was marked deprecated after a cleanup/refactoring in
> [JDK-8066619](https://
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:55:09 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
> Please review this cleanup PR which suggests we remove the package-private,
> unused and deprecated method `java.util.jar.Manifest.make72Safe`.
>
> This method was marked deprecated after a cleanup/refactoring in
> [JDK-8066619](https://
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 19:51:38 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> src/java.management/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/remote/security/MBeanServerFileAccessController.java
>> line 309:
>>
>>> 307: final Subject s;
>>> 308: if (!SharedSecrets.getJavaLangAccess().allowSecurityManager())
>>> {
>>>
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:28:28 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> fix MBeanServerFileAccessController, more test in SM
>
> src/java.management/share/classes/com/sun/jmx/remote/security/MBe
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:52:13 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Currently, JDK modules load by the bootstrap and platform ClassLoaders are
> automatically granted the native access. I am working on an upgrade of JLine
> inside the `jdk.internal.le` module, and I would like to replace the current
> native
> The implementation of this proposal is based on the requirements,
> specification and design choices described in the [JDK-8319332] ticket and
> its respective CSR [JDK-8319333]. What follows are implementation notes
> organized per functional component, with the purpose of assisting to naviga
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 21:58:28 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> This code change adds an alternative implementation of user-based
>> authorization `Subject` APIs that doesn't depend on Security Manager APIs.
>> Depending on if the Security Manager is allowed, the methods store the
>> current subject d
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 18:59:54 GMT, Francisco Ferrari Bihurriet
wrote:
>> The implementation of this proposal is based on the requirements,
>> specification and design choices described in the [JDK-8319332] ticket and
>> its respective CSR [JDK-8319333]. What follows are implementation notes
>>
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 21:58:28 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> This code change adds an alternative implementation of user-based
>> authorization `Subject` APIs that doesn't depend on Security Manager APIs.
>> Depending on if the Security Manager is allowed, the methods store the
>> current subject d
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 21:58:28 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> This code change adds an alternative implementation of user-based
>> authorization `Subject` APIs that doesn't depend on Security Manager APIs.
>> Depending on if the Security Manager is allowed, the methods store the
>> current subject d
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 21:58:28 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> This code change adds an alternative implementation of user-based
>> authorization `Subject` APIs that doesn't depend on Security Manager APIs.
>> Depending on if the Security Manager is allowed, the methods store the
>> current subject d
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:52:13 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Currently, JDK modules load by the bootstrap and platform ClassLoaders are
> automatically granted the native access. I am working on an upgrade of JLine
> inside the `jdk.internal.le` module, and I would like to replace the current
> native
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 13:52:13 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> Currently, JDK modules load by the bootstrap and platform ClassLoaders are
> automatically granted the native access. I am working on an upgrade of JLine
> inside the `jdk.internal.le` module, and I would like to replace the current
> native
Currently, JDK modules load by the bootstrap and platform ClassLoaders are
automatically granted the native access. I am working on an upgrade of JLine
inside the `jdk.internal.le` module, and I would like to replace the current
native bindings with FFM-based bindings (which are now somewhat pro
Please review this cleanup PR which suggests we remove the package-private,
unused and deprecated method `java.util.jar.Manifest.make72Safe`.
This method was marked deprecated after a cleanup/refactoring in
[JDK-8066619](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8066619) caused it to fall
out of use.
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 03:58:18 GMT, John Jiang wrote:
> In method `X509Authentication::createServerPossession`, it looks unnecessary
> to define variable `serverAlias` out of the for-loop.
> It may be better to move `serverAlias` into that loop to narrow down the
> scope.
Marked as reviewed by gl
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:43:33 GMT, John Jiang wrote:
>>> If an alias can be used by the subsequent iterations, that looks a bug.
>>
>> Looks like a bug. So your patch is a bug fix instead of simple cleanup.
>> Should we change the title of this issue or/and provide a test case?
>
> At the beginni
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:26:28 GMT, Guoxiong Li wrote:
>> With my understanding, in each iteration, firstly choose an alias from key
>> manager with a key type, and then try to get the keys and certificates
>> associated with this alias.
>> If an alias or its associated keys and certificates have
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 06:57:23 GMT, John Jiang wrote:
> If an alias can be used by the subsequent iterations, that looks a bug.
Looks like a bug. So your patch is a bug fix instead of simple cleanup. Should
we change the title of this issue or/and provide a test case?
-
PR Review Com
28 matches
Mail list logo
