On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 18:02:38 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
> > In `ECOperations.java`, if I understand this correctly, it is to replace
> > the existing `PointMultiplier` with montgomery-based PointMuliplier. But
> > when I look at the code, I see both are still options. If I read this
> > c
Updated `getService` to check whether `getProvider` returns null when checking
for preferred providers and `continue` the loop if that is the case. Added
`NullPreferredList` test.
-
Commit messages:
- Fixed and renamed test, getService now continues loop instead of returning
null
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 13:01:36 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> [One of the
> test](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/test/jdk/sun/security/mscapi/VeryLongAlias.java)
good link, thanks. Didn’t know the type is even visible for an assert.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:09:37 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> Yes it's self signed one.
>>
>> No it's not added to any other keystore. When I said
>> "TrustedCertificateEntry" it's only because in a Java KeyStore an entry with
>> only a certificate is called a TrustedCertificateEntry.
>>
>> So
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:57:12 GMT, Bernd wrote:
>> rebarbora-mckvak has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8313367: copyright updated
>
> Did you test with CNG keys as well? Using the new providers is much more
> important since
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:09:37 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> Yes it's self signed one.
>>
>> No it's not added to any other keystore. When I said
>> "TrustedCertificateEntry" it's only because in a Java KeyStore an entry with
>> only a certificate is called a TrustedCertificateEntry.
>>
>> So
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:10:16 GMT, rebarbora-mckvak wrote:
>> This fixes the defect described at
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313367
>>
>> If the process does not have write permissions, the store is opened as
>> read-only (instead of failing).
>>
>> Please note that permissions to
