> Performance. Before:
>
> Benchmark(algorithm) (dataSize) (keyLength)
> (provider) Mode Cnt ScoreError Units
> SignatureBench.ECDSA.signSHA256withECDSA1024 256
> thrpt3 6443.934 ± 6.491 ops/s
> SignatureBench.ECDSA.
On Fri, 3 May 2024 11:22:51 GMT, Sean Coffey wrote:
> Using the loopback address by default may prove more reliable for some test
> configurations
>
> ran all jdk_security tests. no issues seen.
Marked as reviewed by rhalade (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pu
I'll probably pick #2 if you also like it.
> On May 6, 2024, at 3:59 PM, Osipov, Michael (IN IT IN)
> wrote:
>
> On 2024-05-06 21:55, Wei-Jun Wang wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>> Thanks for the report. It seems not conforming to the RFC strictly
>> but I hesitate to make a change now.
>> The getKeys()
On 2024-05-06 21:55, Wei-Jun Wang wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the report. It seems not conforming to the RFC strictly
but I hesitate to make a change now.
The getKeys() method uses the PrincipalName.match() method to
compare principal names in case-insensitive style. The same method
is also u
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the report. It seems not conforming to the RFC strictly but I
hesitate to make a change now.
The getKeys() method uses the PrincipalName.match() method to compare principal
names in case-insensitive style. The same method is also used to locate a
ticket from a ccache fil
> On May 6, 2024, at 2:55 PM, Osipov, Michael (IN IT IN)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Weijun,
>
> On 2024-05-06 20:51, Wei-Jun Wang wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>> I see you've just reported a bug on KeyTab. Is that your latest workaround
>> to the request here? That's also the only one I can think of now.
>
>
Hi Weijun,
On 2024-05-06 20:51, Wei-Jun Wang wrote:
Hi Michael,
I see you've just reported a bug on KeyTab. Is that your latest workaround to
the request here? That's also the only one I can think of now.
The bug is unrelated. I just noticed it when working on the issue.
BTW, when you said
Hi Michael,
I see you've just reported a bug on KeyTab. Is that your latest workaround to
the request here? That's also the only one I can think of now.
BTW, when you said "disjoint to the security context", the long term key of the
server *is* not related to any context.
Thanks,
Weijun
> On
Folks,
consider the following code:
KeyTab keytab = KeyTab.getUnboundInstance(new File("..."));
KerberosPrincipal principal = new KerberosPrincipal("foo$",
KerberosPrincipal.KRB_NT_PRINCIPAL);
KerberosKey[] keys = keytab.getKeys(principal);
Let's check the keytab for etype 18 only:
10 2022
On 2024-05-06 16:32, Osipov, Michael (IN IT IN) wrote:
Folks,
I have a GSS security context established and need to calculate a
signature on data received form the client. The client submits me a
forwarded signature calculated by the KDC (Active Directory) with the
server's long term key from
Folks,
I have a GSS security context established and need to calculate a
signature on data received form the client. The client submits me a
forwarded signature calculated by the KDC (Active Directory) with the
server's long term key from the keytab.
As far as I can see ExtendedGSSContext only
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:15:56 GMT, Nizar Benalla wrote:
> For context, I am writing tests to check for accurate use of `@since` tags in
> documentation comments in source code.
> We're following these rules for now:
>
> ### Rule 1: Introduction of New Elements
>
> - If an element is new in JDK
> For context, I am writing tests to check for accurate use of `@since` tags in
> documentation comments in source code.
> We're following these rules for now:
>
> ### Rule 1: Introduction of New Elements
>
> - If an element is new in JDK N, with no equivalent in JDK N-1, it must
> include `@si
> For context, I am writing tests to check for accurate use of `@since` tags in
> documentation comments in source code.
> We're following these rules for now:
>
> ### Rule 1: Introduction of New Elements
>
> - If an element is new in JDK N, with no equivalent in JDK N-1, it must
> include `@si
> Please review this PR that aims to add all the remaining needed `@since` tags
> in `java.base`, and group them into a single fix.
> This is related to #18934 and my work around the `@since` checker feature.
> Explicit `@since` tags are needed for some overriding methods for the purpose
> of the
15 matches
Mail list logo
