Re: RFR: 8296244: Alternate implementation of user-based authorization Subject APIs that doesn’t depend on Security Manager APIs [v3]

2024-03-05 Thread Kevin Walls
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 14:44:29 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: >> Right, this does not depend on the SM. All we need to do is get the >> Subject. >> This method implements the basic monitor (readonly) and control (readwrite) >> access. >> accessMap maps identity String to Access, and the checkAccess() m

Re: RFR: 8296244: Alternate implementation of user-based authorization Subject APIs that doesn’t depend on Security Manager APIs [v3]

2024-03-05 Thread Kevin Walls
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 19:57:25 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote: >> I was not exactly sure if we will support this functionality when there is >> no SM. The class name has `AccessControler` and the method names use >> `checkAccess`, but they actually do not always depend on security manager. > > I think we

Re: RFR: 8305761: Resolve multiple definition of 'jvm' when statically linking with JDK native libraries [v2]

2023-04-11 Thread Kevin Walls
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:38:18 GMT, Jiangli Zhou wrote: >> Rename various 'jvm' variables to 'jvm_' to avoid duplicate symbol >> problems when statically linking the launcher executable with JDK native >> libraries. > > Jiangli Zhou has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional