On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 05:52:23 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> As this stands (modulo my other comments) this change is mostly OK. Using
>> the SOFT_MAX value within java.base is fine. Using SOFT_MAX within
>> java.base-related tests is a little suspicious, because it requires the
>> addition of di
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 05:39:09 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> Please review this cleanup PR which updates code and tests in `java.base` to
>> consistently use `jdk.internal.util.ArraySupport.SOFT_MAX_ARRAY_LENGTH`
>> when referring to the JVM's maximum array size implementation limit.
>> Currentl
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 15:14:31 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
> Please review this cleanup PR which updates code and tests in `java.base` to
> consistently use `jdk.internal.util.ArraySupport.SOFT_MAX_ARRAY_LENGTH` when
> referring to the JVM's maximum array size implementation limit. Currently,
>
On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 15:14:31 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
> Please review this cleanup PR which updates code and tests in `java.base` to
> consistently use `jdk.internal.util.ArraySupport.SOFT_MAX_ARRAY_LENGTH` when
> referring to the JVM's maximum array size implementation limit. Currently,
>
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:13:17 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> The reported leak was caused by the death of the `Cleanup-SunPKCS11` thread.
> The cleanup thread in turn died because of an exception thrown from
> `removeNativeKey` that resulted from 2 threads executing that method at the
> same tim
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 23:36:41 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> After the "this-escape" lint warning was added to javac (JDK-8015831), the
> base module was not updated to be able to compile with this warning enabled.
> This PR makes the necessary changes to allow the base module to build with
> the warni
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:46:35 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> The socket read/write JFR events currently use instrumentation of java.base
>> code using templates in the jdk.jfr modules. This results in some java.base
>> code residing in the jdk.jfr module which is undesirable.
>>
>> JDK19 added sta
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 22:54:47 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> With generalized see and link tags that can refer to anchors (JDK-8200337),
>> the see and link tags in core libraries should be updated to use this
>> feature when possible. This PR covers such updates for java.base.
>
> Joe Darcy has updat
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:46:43 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> This PR proposes a variety of modernisations to the `jdk.sctp` module.
>
> During the fix of https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296024, several
> improvement areas were identified including:
>
> * Replacing duplicate code segments
> *
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 20:11:34 GMT, Jim Laskey wrote:
>> Enhance the Java programming language with string templates, which are
>> similar to string literals but contain embedded expressions. A string
>> template is interpreted at run time by replacing each expression with the
>> result of evalu
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 16:45:35 GMT, liach wrote:
>> XenoAmess has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> do it as naotoj said
>
> 'the new' fix should be applied to newHashMap etc. too.
@liach
> 'the new' fix should be applied to ne
11 matches
Mail list logo
