Re: RFR: 8287596: Reorg jdk.test.lib.util.ForceGC [v11]

2022-07-01 Thread Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:28:36 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: > > Could someone in Oracle help me run Mach 5 testing? > > The CI Passed for Tiers 1-3. Thanks a lot! - PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/8979

Re: RFR: 8287596: Reorg jdk.test.lib.util.ForceGC [v11]

2022-07-01 Thread Roger Riggs
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:31:28 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote: > Could someone in Oracle help me run Mach 5 testing? The CI Passed for Tiers 1-3. - PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/8979

Re: RFR: 8287596: Reorg jdk.test.lib.util.ForceGC [v11]

2022-07-01 Thread Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 18:44:30 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote: >> This is a follow up update per comments in [JDK-8287384 >> PR](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8907). The tier1 and tier2 test in >> open part looks good to me. Please help to run Mach5 just case the closed >> test cases are

Re: RFR: 8287596: Reorg jdk.test.lib.util.ForceGC [v11]

2022-06-30 Thread Roger Riggs
On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 18:44:30 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote: >> This is a follow up update per comments in [JDK-8287384 >> PR](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8907). The tier1 and tier2 test in >> open part looks good to me. Please help to run Mach5 just case the closed >> test cases are

Re: RFR: 8287596: Reorg jdk.test.lib.util.ForceGC [v11]

2022-06-30 Thread Xue-Lei Andrew Fan
> This is a follow up update per comments in [JDK-8287384 > PR](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8907). The tier1 and tier2 test in > open part looks good to me. Please help to run Mach5 just case the closed > test cases are impacted. Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request increme