On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 08:12:33 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> Mark and Sean, thanks for the reviews ! Do I need another review ? Best
> regards, Matthias
No, you can integrate now.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11016
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 16:16:53 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> The java/security/Exceptions/ChainingConstructors jdk jtreg test shows quite
>> a lot of code duplication. The test code can be simplified e.g. by using
>> generics. Additionally the test failure output was improved and a test for
>>
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 16:16:53 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> The java/security/Exceptions/ChainingConstructors jdk jtreg test shows quite
>> a lot of code duplication. The test code can be simplified e.g. by using
>> generics. Additionally the test failure output was improved and a test for
>>
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:49:21 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The java/security/Exceptions/ChainingConstructors jdk jtreg test shows quite
> a lot of code duplication. The test code can be simplified e.g. by using
> generics. Additionally the test failure output was improved and a test for
> the
> The java/security/Exceptions/ChainingConstructors jdk jtreg test shows quite
> a lot of code duplication. The test code can be simplified e.g. by using
> generics. Additionally the test failure output was improved and a test for
> the constructors of CertPathBuilderException was added.
Matthi
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:15:38 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/security/Exceptions/ChainingConstructors.java line 208:
>>
>>> 206: throw new SecurityException("Test 17 failed");
>>> 207: }
>>> 208: */
>>
>> I don't know why this is commented out, but when I uncomm
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 14:01:29 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> The java/security/Exceptions/ChainingConstructors jdk jtreg test shows quite
>> a lot of code duplication. The test code can be simplified e.g. by using
>> generics. Additionally the test failure output was improved and a test for
>> the c
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:49:21 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The java/security/Exceptions/ChainingConstructors jdk jtreg test shows quite
> a lot of code duplication. The test code can be simplified e.g. by using
> generics. Additionally the test failure output was improved and a test for
> the
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:37:30 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Add a `noreg-self` label to the JBS issue since this is a fix to the test
> itself. Also, I would classify this as an Enhancement, and not a Bug.
Thanks, this all makes sense ! I adjusted the JBS issue.
-
PR: https://git.openjd
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:49:21 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The java/security/Exceptions/ChainingConstructors jdk jtreg test shows quite
> a lot of code duplication. The test code can be simplified e.g. by using
> generics. Additionally the test failure output was improved and a test for
> the
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 12:49:21 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> The java/security/Exceptions/ChainingConstructors jdk jtreg test shows quite
> a lot of code duplication. The test code can be simplified e.g. by using
> generics. Additionally the test failure output was improved and a test for
> the
The java/security/Exceptions/ChainingConstructors jdk jtreg test shows quite a
lot of code duplication. The test code can be simplified e.g. by using
generics. Additionally the test failure output was improved and a test for the
constructors of CertPathBuilderException was added.
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
