Re: XMLCipher - enhancement for content encryption

2004-01-05 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
At 9:47 AM +0100 1/5/04, Werner Dittmann wrote: If it is just "syntax sugar" and Parsers can replace it with Text... why does DOM defines an own Node type for it (wouldn't Text be enough)? It would be enough, and probably should have been. Note that DOM implementations are allowed but *not requi

Re: XMLCipher - enhancement for content encryption

2004-01-05 Thread Werner Dittmann
Berin, Dims, all, based on our e-mail discussion I've enhanced the XMLCipher to support c14n serialization. Only small modifications were necessary: - a new getInstance method with additional c14n algo parameter - a new getProviderInstance with additional c14n algo parameter - small modifications

Re: XMLCipher - enhancement for content encryption

2004-01-05 Thread Werner Dittmann
H, that's a specific point of view. I'm not aware on the previous discussions about CDATA. I'm just looking at the W3C XML specifications and the DOM 3 specifications. They both support CDATA, they both define rules for it. A CDATA is allowed at any place where charatcer data may occure. Thu