At 9:47 AM +0100 1/5/04, Werner Dittmann wrote:
If it is just "syntax sugar" and Parsers can replace it with Text... why
does
DOM defines an own Node type for it (wouldn't Text be enough)?
It would be enough, and probably should have been. Note that DOM
implementations are allowed but *not requi
Berin, Dims, all,
based on our e-mail discussion I've enhanced the XMLCipher to support c14n
serialization. Only small modifications were necessary:
- a new getInstance method with additional c14n algo parameter
- a new getProviderInstance with additional c14n algo parameter
- small modifications
H, that's a specific point of view.
I'm not aware on the previous discussions about CDATA.
I'm just looking at the W3C XML specifications and the DOM 3 specifications.
They both support CDATA, they both define rules for it. A CDATA
is allowed at any place where charatcer data may occure.
Thu