[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue aff

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue aff

RE: XMLSignatureException: The requested algorithm ... does not e xist

Title: Message After further investigation, the problem seems to be the combination of the following two factors:   1.  the JCE Algorithm Mappings specified in org/apache/xml/security/resource/config.xml do not include any mappings for IBM   2.  the JDK and libraries supplied with Websphere

Re: Memory & Performance

Martin Labarthe Dubois wrote: I had memory problems signing big XMLs, so I decided to make my own specific XML signature algorithm that works with an specific "home made JAXB", i finished it today and i discoverd two things, one is that it signs faster than 1.04, but identical to 1.1, but of course

Memory & Performance

I had memory problems signing big XMLs, so I decided to make my own specific XML signature algorithm that works with an specific "home made JAXB", i finished it today and i discoverd two things, one is that it signs faster than 1.04, but identical to 1.1, but of course much more less flexible, a

Re: 1.1 Release - much Faster ??? & Memory Issue

> If you don't use xpath transformations everything is a lot faster(If you > use it, you get a moderate speed-up). But the best thing is that know > that the engineSign is significative, the Scott's native JCE > implementation improves the think a lot(x4 times) (Thanks Scott). > Right now in my te

Re: 1.1 Release - much Faster ???

Scott Cantor wrote: is it possible that this version signs seven times faster that the 1.04 ??? because, I just replaced the old jars an obtained those times. My test was about 3 times faster, but depending on the test case, I wouldn't be surprised. 1.1 is a huge improvement thanks to those

RE: 1.1 Release - much Faster ???

> is it possible that this version signs seven times faster > that the 1.04 ??? > because, I just replaced the old jars an obtained those times. My test was about 3 times faster, but depending on the test case, I wouldn't be surprised. 1.1 is a huge improvement thanks to those last minute patches

1.1 Release - much Faster ???

Hi All, is it possible that this version signs seven times faster that the 1.04 ??? because, I just replaced the old jars an obtained those times. MLD

node without ds: ...

Hi, Is it possible to create this kind of signature? http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#";> . I mean I have created my own schema (for XAdES implementation) and I have to create document with this kind node (ds: inside node but not is Signature)? andrzeJ Matejko