Re: What's next? (Some advice needed).

2004-05-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Berin Lautenbach wrote: Raul, I've added one or two comments below, but at the end of the day - what interests you most? There are plenty of things that need to be done (you've mentioned some below). Anything you do will be highly valued, so go with what interests you most :>. And if you can

Re: What's next? (Some advice needed).

2004-05-18 Thread William Bathurst
Is there some way to break up the processing? I noticed that signing large documents takes about 20-40 times memory. This seems very inefficient. They should be a flag or way to process large documents. For example, GNU soap can use DIME to stream data such that it can be broken up. It can send and

Support for other languages

2004-05-18 Thread trebor iksrazal
We have a system up and running using xmlsec and axis, client and server implemented with java. We are getting questions about multi-platform support, particuarly Microsoft type languages. Our java client signs and encrypts the message, the java server decrypts and verifies the recieved message,

RE: Filter2 transforms fails when xpath-values contains prefix

2004-05-18 Thread Scott Cantor
> I am currently working with Filter2 transforms and XPath > transforms. And I have problems when namespace prefixes are used in some > element that is present in a filter2-xpath value. There's a way of specifying inclusive namespace prefixes, analagous to what one does with Exclusive c14n when

Filter2 transforms fails when xpath-values contains prefix

2004-05-18 Thread Rafael
Hi! I am currently working with Filter2 transforms and XPath transforms. And I have problems when namespace prefixes are used in some element that is present in a filter2-xpath value. I provide the code that I am using to calculate transformation output at the end of the mail. Example: suppos

Re: TLP Status

2004-05-18 Thread Davanum Srinivas
#1: +1 on security TLP #2: How about VAJRA (http://www.hindunet.org/saraswati/indianarms.htm) #3: Don't count me out :) #4: That's gotta be you :) -- dims On Tue, 18 May 2004 22:20:16 +1000, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to move this TLP thing forward a bit. > > W

TLP Status

2004-05-18 Thread Berin Lautenbach
I'd like to move this TLP thing forward a bit. What's the feeling on a scope for a project based coming out of XML-Security? Do we want to concentrate on cryptographic products? Stick with XML security? Go with all security? I'm *really* tempted to go with a high level security project and see

Re: What's next? (Some advice needed).

2004-05-18 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Raul, I've added one or two comments below, but at the end of the day - what interests you most? There are plenty of things that need to be done (you've mentioned some below). Anything you do will be highly valued, so go with what interests you most :>. And if you can keep improving the perfo

Re: merlin 23

2004-05-18 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Oops! Done :>. Cheers, Berin Davanum Srinivas wrote: ping :) -- dims On Tue, 11 May 2004 22:40:43 +1000, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: . Great minds - I just sent you an e-mail on the list. I'm about to hit the sack for the night, my apologies :<. It *will* happen tomorrow