[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-20 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-20 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[GUMP@brutus]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-20 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-20 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

Re: Filter2 transforms fails when xpath-values contains prefix

2004-05-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As, while performing those steps, we haven't added a ds:Signature yet, we don't have any dsig-xpath:XPath elements (nodes) in the Document. How can we apply your second option? Regards, -R Well, I have found where the problem is: In the CachedXPathFuncHereApi.eval() { ... // Crea

Re: Filter2 transforms fails when xpath-values contains prefix

2004-05-20 Thread Rafael
Berin Lautenbach wingsofhermes.org> writes: > > Rafael wrote: > > > I have been examining the source code around the 'Transforms' implementation and > > it seems like only ns declarations in the context node(s) are used. That would > > mean that only Constants.SignatureSpecNS is somehow rec

Re: Filter2 transforms fails when xpath-values contains prefix

2004-05-20 Thread Rafael
What version of the xml-sec-library are > you using? > ItÂs the 1.1 or the CVS HEAD one? > > Raul I am using 1_1_0 (april 2004). The problem is easy to reproduce with the code at my first mail and with a "intersect" with value "//bla:ToBeSigned". You get: org.apache.xml.security.transforms.Tra

Re: Support for other languages

2004-05-20 Thread Berin Lautenbach
trebor iksrazal wrote: Our java client signs and encrypts the message, the java server decrypts and verifies the recieved message, forwards to an axis service which gets data, the server then signs and encrypts the data, and lastly the client decrypts and verifies the recieved message. My questions

Re: Filter2 transforms fails when xpath-values contains prefix

2004-05-20 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Scott Cantor wrote: That's why I know in the latter case, the problem he's having comes up, but I didn't understand why it would be a problem with inclusive, so maybe I'm off base. In this case canonicalisation should happen after the transform (as the transform works on the nodeset). So I don't

Re: Filter2 transforms fails when xpath-values contains prefix

2004-05-20 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Rafael wrote: I have been examining the source code around the 'Transforms' implementation and it seems like only ns declarations in the context node(s) are used. That would mean that only Constants.SignatureSpecNS is somehow recognized. From memory, that's correct. So I think what you need to d

XMLCipher.enryptData()

2004-05-20 Thread Oleg Zenzin
The question is: why XMLCipher.enryptData(Document context, Element element, boolean contentMode) is private? In our project we expect following encrypted data in SOAP envelope: ...