Re: AW: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29188] New: - Minor clean-ups and speed/m emory improvment

2004-05-24 Thread Erwin van der Koogh
just a short note about Base64. I use the Base64 of XML security in WSS4J functions and it works perfectly. Any reason why to use the Xerces implementation? The Base64 encoding class in XML Security is quite a mess and I have been trying to replace it as well, with something standard, faster and c

AW: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29188] New: - Minor clean-ups and speed/m emory improvment

2004-05-24 Thread Dittmann Werner
All, just a short note about Base64. I use the Base64 of XML security in WSS4J functions and it works perfectly. Any reason why to use the Xerces implementation? In addition the Base64 of XML security provides a way to control line wrap, that is if I call Sting xxx = Base64.encode(data,

AW: Re[2]: XMLCipher.enryptData()

2004-05-24 Thread Dittmann Werner
Oleg, I'm using XML encryption for SOAP in the Apache project WSS4J and I use doFinal to do it for SOAP. Maybe you can have a look at Apache's WSS4J project, in particular to the encryption functions that control and perform WSS compliant SOAP encryption. Regards, Werner > -Ursprüngliche Nac

Please un-subscribe me

2004-05-24 Thread Sarah Liu
I requested to un-subscribe about a month ago, but I am still receiving emails. Please un_subscribe me. Thanks. >From: Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed >Date: 24 May 04 19:18:06 > >

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security prerequisite failed

2004-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
xml-security/rss.xml Atom: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/xml-security/xml-security/atom.xml -- Produced by Gump 2.0.3-alpha-0002. [Run (20040524 15:00:12, brutus:brutus-public:20040524 15:00:12)] http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/index.html http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/options.html

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security prerequisite failed

2004-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
xml-security/rss.xml Atom: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/xml-security/xml-security/atom.xml -- Produced by Gump 2.0.3-alpha-0002. [Run (20040524 15:00:12, brutus:brutus-public:20040524 15:00:12)] http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/index.html http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/options.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29188] - Minor clean-ups and speed/memory improvment

2004-05-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29188] New: - Minor clean-ups and speed/memory improvment

2004-05-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

decryption ?

2004-05-24 Thread Nedelcho Stanev
Hello,   Is there are some limit of size for encripted block of data? when i try to decrypt some large block i got assertion in transcodeFromUTF8 function and i see that inside there are some buffers with fixed size 2048, 2500 bytes and so. is there are s way to increment this buffer from m

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

Re: XML Signature

2004-05-24 Thread Nedelcho Stanev
Hello, This is my obsolete email. Yep i got templatesign example worked. and after this i send second email with rsasign/validate examples. thanks berin. regards, decho - Original Message - From: "Berin Lautenbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 6:2

[C++] Encoding: XSCryptCryptoBase64::encode()

2004-05-24 Thread Milan Tomic
Title: [C++] Encoding: XSCryptCryptoBase64::encode() Berin, I've found very interesting problem with encoding. Take a look at this line of the code from XSCryptCryptoBase64::encode(): t = ((m_inputBuffer[i++] << 4) & 0x30) | (m_inputBuffer[i] >> 4); The problem is that order of executio

Re[2]: XMLCipher.enryptData()

2004-05-24 Thread Oleg Zenzin
Yes, Berin, I need EncryptedData later in my code - to replace contents of soap:Header and soap:Body. Because of this replacement done in Axis Handler i cannot just change the SOAP message xml-document, but have to work with Axis object representation of this message. So, to

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: xml-security/xml-security failed

2004-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

Re: XML Signature

2004-05-24 Thread Berin Lautenbach
I think you got this worked out? Just in case, you can take any full signature and re-use as input into templatesign. I posted an HMAC example to the list some time back - you might want to do a search on eyebrowse ( http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse ) Cheers, Berin > Hello again, > > Loo

Re: XML Signature

2004-05-24 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Decho, Cool! I'm at a conference until Thursday, but I'll see if I can't integrate into the samples. Thanks! Cheers, Berin > Hello, > > I tried to fix the situation :) > so i attach 2 files - simpleRSASign.cpp and simpleRSAValidate.cpp > and 2 projects simpleRSASign.vcproj and simpleRSAVal