--
To subscribe to this information via syndicated feeds:
RSS: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/xml-security/xml-security/rss.xml
Atom: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/xml-security/xml-security/atom.xml
--
Produced by Gump 2.0.3-alpha-0002.
[Run (20040525 09:00:04, brutus:brutus-public:2
--
To subscribe to this information via syndicated feeds:
RSS: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/xml-security/xml-security/rss.xml
Atom: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/xml-security/xml-security/atom.xml
--
Produced by Gump 2.0.3-alpha-0002.
[Run (20040525 09:00:04, brutus:brutus-public:2
Hello,
When i continue to play with this function i found another problem.
in the lines 347+:
t->transcodeFrom(&src[totalBytesEaten], toEat, outputBuf, MYBUFSIZE,
bytesEaten, charSizes);
outputBuf[iReaded] = chNull;
function transcodeFrom can read less than buffer size bytes, and
Hi everybody,
I'm
trying to sign a DOMNode from a DOMDocument with the XSEC Api, but I'm
quite lost and need some help
Let me explain:
I
know how to sign a whole XML document, but what I want is to be able to
sign a particular DOMNode and obviously, verify it later. It is poss
nformation via syndicated feeds:
RSS: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/xml-security/xml-security/rss.xml
Atom: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/xml-security/xml-security/atom.xml
--
Produced by Gump 2.0.3-alpha-0002.
[Run (20040525 03:00:06, brutus:brutus-public:20040525 03:00:06)]
http://
nformation via syndicated feeds:
RSS: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/xml-security/xml-security/rss.xml
Atom: http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/xml-security/xml-security/atom.xml
--
Produced by Gump 2.0.3-alpha-0002.
[Run (20040525 03:00:06, brutus:brutus-public:20040525 03:00:06)]
http://
Hello all,
there are one small bug in this
function.
and when package of data is more than 2048 bytes
exception occurs
problem come from loop where we pass trough
original source
line 347
int toEat = ( bytesToEat > 2048 ? 2048 :
bytesToEat );
must be replaced
int toEat = ((bytesToE
> So I think what you were doing in your original commented out code was
> correct.
Great!
Thanks a lot to all of you guys!
Regards,
-R
On 25/05/2004, at 8:40, Dittmann Werner wrote:
All,
just a short note about Base64. I use the Base64 of XML
security in WSS4J functions and it works perfectly. Any
reason why to use the Xerces implementation?
In addition the Base64 of XML security provides a way
to control line wrap, that is if I c
