None of my company's code currently relies on real-time type information
(RTTI), so we disable it to avoid the overhead. This is possible in
part because Xerces-C explicitly does not use RTTI (to ensure
portability). XML-Security-C, on the other hand, uses dynamic_cast<>
and thus relies on RTTI.
I will fixed it, so it is only available for testing. Thanks.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:10:59 +0530, Vishal Mahajan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raul Benito wrote:
> How do you manage to get there? They are not include in the global unit
> test, aren't they? This unit test is included as run as p
Raul Benito wrote:
How do you manage to get there?
They are not include in the global unit test, aren't they?
This unit test is included as run as part of the global "test" target.
BTW, +1 for 1.2.1.
Regards,
Vishal
It was for me to test a simple implementation of the
NameSpaceSymbT
How do you manage to get there?
They are not include in the global unit test, aren't they?
It was for me to test a simple implementation of the
NameSpaceSymbTable that I was developing, that sadly I lost (doing an
update on the wrong directory).
This test fails because the current implementation
Hi Raul,
There's a unit test failing - NameSpaceSymbTableTest.testUnrederedNodes.
Do we want to fix it for 1.2.1?
Thanks,
Vishal
Raul Benito wrote:
Shall we release the 1.2.1 version from v1_2_1j label from
CVS(Changelog bellow)?
[ ] +1, Yes
[ ] +0, Don't know
[ ] -1. No.
Regards,
Raul
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
