Re: [Patch] b64Buf to short for certs with a key length longer than 1024 bits

2005-05-13 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Done (belatedly). Thanks! Cheers, Berin Vadim Ismailov wrote: Here's another one. OpenSSLCryptoKeyRSA.cpp line 198: unsigned char sigVal[512]; I was using 4096 bit RSA key and it was corrupting stack during signature verification. I changed buffer size to 1024 and it works now. EVP_DecodeUp

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28520] - No DESTDIR support

2005-05-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28519] - Parallel build failure

2005-05-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: 1.2 C++ release

2005-05-13 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Trying to close out all the bug reports now for something in the next week or two (will need to do a vote on the list as well). I really am sorry this has taken so long - work kind of hit me out of left field with a huge project. Cheers, Berin Jesse Pelton wrote: About 10 days ago Berin

Signing large files in Java breaking with cvs version?

2005-05-13 Thread Scott Cantor
I'm still investigating, but is anybody else seeing problems signing a large file (not huge, just 200k or so) with an enveloped signature? I'm seeing crashes in the c14n transform step where it tries to flush the new UnsyncBufferedOutputStream class, which tells the internal digester to update itse

Re: DSIGSignature::calculateSignedInfoAndReferenceHash

2005-05-13 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Well that took longer than expected! Have just committed to CVS. Thanks! Cheers, Berin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Berin, that's o.k. for us, thanks, Eckehard -Original Message- From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mittwoch, 2. März 2005 10:06 To: security-dev@xml

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33079] - KeyInfo

2005-05-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu