> I'm afraid that we are going to have the same discussin with java
> library(and bigger).
Really? I thought the Java library already used URIs. I'm using them now...
> Perhaps it is time to decide a little policy for this thing. I'd like
> Scott recomendation...
> What othe people think?
My mai
> -Original Message-
> From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 5:42 AM
> To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Use of URIs rather than enums in C++ library
>
> I was thinking something similar, but maybe wait until a 2.0 release
> before r
Scott Cantor wrote:
But does anyone feel they (the enum based creation calls) should be left
in-perpetuity? (They won't be removed quickly, but they will eventually
disappear.)
I'd expect them to be deprecated for one major release (1.3?) and then
potentially dropped afterward.
I was think
I'm afraid that we are going to have the same discussin with java
library(and bigger).
Perhaps it is time to decide a little policy for this thing. I'd like
Scott recomendation...
What othe people think?
On 7/4/05, Scott Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But does anyone feel they (the enum b
Heiner Westphal wrote:
...
(ever tried to RSA-sign with an DSA-pubkey?).
...
Stop, no! I did not even try to sign anything using a pubkey
(would be pretty pointless, anyone can, but only one could check
the sig, hehe).
But I tried to do an SHA-1/RSA signature using an DSA keypair,
which did no
Hi Martin!
See my comments inline.
Martin Ravell wrote:
Hi Heiner,
Thanks for the response.
I've been giving this a little thought as I get up to speed with the whole
xmldsig thing and pretty much reached the same conclusion.
Fortunately my specific application pretty much has control over
