RE: Signature validation issues

2005-09-01 Thread David Garcia
Thanks a lot Sean :D Regards Dave Garcia -Mensaje original- De: Sean Mullan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 01 de septiembre de 2005 14:29 Para: security-dev@xml.apache.org Asunto: Re: Signature validation issues The JSR 105 API which will be added to the next (1.4) relea

Re: Signature validation issues

2005-09-01 Thread Sean Mullan
The JSR 105 API which will be added to the next (1.4) release of Apache XMLSec allows you to determine whether an invalid signature was caused by a signature value that failed to verify and/or if one or more of the reference digests failed to match. --Sean David Garcia wrote: Hi, My name

Signature validation issues

2005-09-01 Thread David Garcia
Hi,   My name is David Garcia and I’m developing an XmlSignature Validation engine. In the first step it uses apache security framework to check signature’s correctness and when the signature is valid there’s no problem but when there’s a problem with something (like a bad hash, invalid S

Re: Using WSS4J for signing large XML messages - crosspost to XML-SEC

2005-09-01 Thread Werner Dittmann
I would doubt if WSS4J works with this type of messages. We use DOM, XML-SEC uses DOM, and Xalan uses DOM too. Also during the processing of the message there is a need to perform cannonicalization. IMHO, the current c14n implementation requires to have the full document as DOM in memory. I'm not