Document removes xml header

2006-03-22 Thread Michael Kail
Morning everybody! Could it be, that the java class org.w3c.dom.Document removes my xml header information(http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#","";); XMLSignature sig = new XMLSignature(doc, BaseURI, XMLSignature.ALGO_ID_SIGNATURE_DSA);

Re: Improve performance of XML Signing

2006-03-22 Thread Jimmy Zhang
I also recommed that you look at vtd-XmL http://vtd-xml.sf.net... - Original Message - From: "Arshad Noor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:34 PM Subject: Re: Improve performance of XML Signing Have you characterized the performance of the end-to-end transac

Re: Improve performance of XML Signing

2006-03-22 Thread Arshad Noor
Murugan, Characterization requires that you know more than the total time taken for specific operations - you need to know how much of your time is spent waiting for I/O, CPU, locks, etc. so that you know where to optimize. Knowing that signing takes a total of 890ms still does not indicate wher

RE: Improve performance of XML Signing

2006-03-22 Thread Murugan Selvaraj
Yes I have you characterized the performance of the end-to-end transaction to determine where your bottle-necks are.The bottle-necks are signing the URI of the XML document that takes 890 milliseconds (We are not even signing whole XML document)using enveloped sign.I just developed one sample XML f

Re: Improve performance of XML Signing

2006-03-22 Thread Arshad Noor
Have you characterized the performance of the end-to-end transaction to determine where your bottle-necks are? Without that you're shooting in the dark - i.e. you could spend a lot of time optimizing components of the process and still not a dent in the overall signing time. Arshad Noor StrongAu

Improve performance of XML Signing

2006-03-22 Thread Murugan Selvaraj
Hi All,   We are trying to improve the performance of the XML signing done using apache tool kit.Can any one help and guide me on improving the performance of the signing   Help would be appreciated!!!   Thanks Murugan      

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39029] - Stax verifier JSR105 implementation

2006-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn / cvs help

2006-03-22 Thread Raul Benito
We must change this Are there any people in the list(with good English skills) that want to update the documentation? - The svn info - More examples, articles.. - Links to articles... They will be very appreciated.. I will pay with virtual beers ;) On 3/22/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAI

Re: svn / cvs help

2006-03-22 Thread Davanum Srinivas
plz run "svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xml/security/trunk xml-security" On 3/22/06, Chris Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to pull down the latest devel version of the xml security > java library, but am having issues. I am trying to follow the directions > on http://xml.ap

svn / cvs help

2006-03-22 Thread Chris Black
I am trying to pull down the latest devel version of the xml security java library, but am having issues. I am trying to follow the directions on http://xml.apache.org/security/download.html but they don't seem to be working (I am unable to do a cvs login with those directions). There are also