DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39200] - XMLCipher-loadEncryptedKey() doesn't set the correct CarriedKeyName element.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

AW: TLP Resolution

+1 to #3 +1 to Sanctuary BTW, do I have karma to XML-security? Or "only" to WebServices? :-) Regards, Werner > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 14:06 > An: security-dev@xml.apache.org > Betreff: Re: TLP Res

Re: TLP Resolution

+1 to #3 (you as chair and all of us as pmc members) On 5/2/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All, So we have two names that people seem to like Raksha Santuary Any other takers? We also have a scope of "...open-source software related to security..." Thoughts welcome! If no

Re: TLP Resolution

All, So we have two names that people seem to like Raksha Santuary Any other takers? We also have a scope of "...open-source software related to security..." Thoughts welcome! If no more ideas come forth on either of these, I'm going to start a vote covering: 1. The proposal - do people su

Re: XML Security information in projects.apache.org

Cool! Raul Benito wrote: > You can check it now in: > http://projects.apache.org/projects/xml_security_java.html > There are some errors that are already corrected in svn(dunno how much > it takes to update). > > Next step do the C++ one. > > Regards, > > Raul > -- > http://r-bg.com > >