For my part...
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
> Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I'm going to make this happen by hook or by crook.
> >
> > I've floated the idea on board@ and got no objections, so lets make
> > it formal.
> >
> > All committers need to cast a vote on the following.
> >
> > 1
woohoo!! welcome ceki! we could sure use all the help we can get.
- dims
On 6/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are my (non-binding) votes.
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
Given that my current project will be heavily relying on XML-security
and WS-Security and also as a form
Sorry for the spurious message which was inadvertently sent to this list.
DISCLAIMER
This message is intended only for use by the person
to whom it is addressed. It may contain information
that is privileged and confidential. Its content does
not
DISCLAIMER
This message is intended only for use by the person
to whom it is addressed. It may contain information
that is privileged and confidential. Its content does
not constitute a formal commitment by Lombard
Odier Darier Hentsch Group and any
Here are my (non-binding) votes.
1) +1
2) Santuario
3) +1
Given that my current project will be
heavily relying on XML-security
and WS-Security and also as a former
cryptography enthusiast, I would
like to devote part of my time and energy
contributing to XML-security
and WS-security projects.
