DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40826] - Private keys must be instance of RSAPrivate or have PKCS#8 encoding

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43056] - Library does not allow specify provider for private key operations

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43056] - Library does not allow specify provider for private key operations

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43056] - Library does not allow specify provider for private key operations

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43056] - Library does not allow specify provider for private key operations

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: How to sign a sub-tree

> And I reference it by: > > sig.addDocument(BaseURI+"#pdpaId", transforms, > Constants.ALGO_ID_DIGEST_SHA1); Yes, if the signature is detached. If it's in the same document, the reference is just a bare fragment. > Do you mean that - would that select the subtree if both the attribute > name

Re: How to sign a sub-tree

Hi, > > I think I could also have an identifying attribute in the , > > and replace the expression with id("nameOfIDAttr"). Which is, I think, > > the recommended way as it is faster and less error-prone (I can assume > > Schema-aware entities). > > Then by all means do not use XPath. But if you u