Scott Cantor schrieb:
Because we use it in WSS4J we always rely on the backward compatibility.
Changing the WSS4J code just to circumvent a problem would cause a major
effort to many applications that actually use WSS4J. Before changing
WSS4J we shall check if a fix in xmlsec is more appropriate.
> Because we use it in WSS4J we always rely on the backward compatibility.
> Changing the WSS4J code just to circumvent a problem would cause a major
> effort to many applications that actually use WSS4J. Before changing
> WSS4J we shall check if a fix in xmlsec is more appropriate.
If the issue i
I don't know what the cause of this regression could be.
The best thing to do is for Arnaud or Peter to file a new bug at
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla under the Security project and if possible,
attach a standalone (i.e. not dependent on WSS4J) test case that reproduces the
problem.
Tha
