Sean Mullan wrote on 2009-03-25:
> JSR 105 is consistent with your view and documents the behavior. If the
> contents of the document are subsequently modified, then you need to
> instantiate a new XMLSignature object.
Well, in this case, nothing's being modified. What happens is you sign the
DOM,
Yeah you may be right, though I don't think the behavior has ever been
documented one way or another. Hoping Raul will answer as he is more
familiar with that code than I am.
JSR 105 is consistent with your view and documents the behavior. If the
contents of the document are subsequently modif
Sean Mullan wrote on 2009-03-25:
> I don't think the behavior is intentional. Can you please file a bug at
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla in the security category and attach
> your test case?
At least dating back to the 1.2 days, it was quite intentional. I found
numerous issues with reusing
I don't think the behavior is intentional. Can you please file a bug at
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla in the security category and attach
your test case?
Thanks,
Sean
Bruno Harbulot wrote:
Hello,
I've been writing a test based on OpenSAML, which uses Apache XML
Security 1.4.2. In this t
