Scott Cantor wrote:
Philip Brown wrote on 2009-10-09:
I'm trying to compile xml-security-c, in 64bits, in solaris.
I've never done it (the 64-bit case), and since nothing but a Shibboleth
build would be likely to try this, I doubt that it works.
These particular makefiles have a long history
Scott Cantor wrote:
I have no idea how to attempt a 64-bit build, but if you provide the
necessary instructions in a bug report, I'll take a look when I have a
chance.
that's pretty easy...just replace
CC=x
with
CC="x -m64"
works for both sun cc and gcc
Although you then have to make sure
Philip Brown wrote on 2009-10-09:
> I'm trying to compile xml-security-c, in 64bits, in solaris.
I've never done it (the 64-bit case), and since nothing but a Shibboleth
build would be likely to try this, I doubt that it works.
These particular makefiles have a long history of screwing up on ever
I'm trying to compile xml-security-c, in 64bits, in solaris.
I have had no problems compiling all the myriad dependancies required.
However, when it comes to xml-security-c, I hit a silent failure to link.
Configuration happens with little problem. I have tried version 1.4.0, and 1.5.1
I have tr
There's an implementation available, but just be warned it is very much a work
in progress (actually nobody has worked on it for a while) and does not support
all of the XML Signature features. In particular, the following are not
supported: signature generation, inclusive c14n, enveloped signat
Hello,
i run into a document at w3c.org/next steps from 2007 describing Raul Benito
being involved with STaX-based XML Digital Signature. I'm wondering whats the
status of this project?
Thanks,
Igor Styrman
