I agree with your decision based on test. It will be risky and will have
littele gain to use == for string comparison.
Eric
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Chad La Joie wrote:
> Okay, I'll prepare a patch for you by the end of the week.
>
>
> On 8/24/10 2:23 PM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
>>
Xerces C DOM parser wrapped as Java DOM. What I mean conventional equals()
should be preferred though == might have small performance gain.
Eric
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Chad La Joie wrote:
> Which parser/DOM impl were you using?
>
>
> On 8/13/10 1:33 PM, eric fu w
I encountered a problem before(version 1.4) caused by apache java code which
uses == for namespace comparison. In my own code, when adding DOM node to a
document, I have to create namespace using string from Apache classes. That
is, I cannot directly use "http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"; as nam
Is there any history why xml security project is called Santuario. Did some
search, closest one showing up is a Catholic Church. Most of time, when
talking with each others, we use Apache XML security, nobody ever used
"Santuario" as I know. Personally, I think the name does not contribute to
any p
If I were to create a patch to fix this, what is the process, and is that
worthwhile?
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:59 PM, eric fu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I checked out a latest copy for xml security Java from svn trunk(1.4.3).
> But ant test showed a few failures and it took me quite some ti
Hi,
I checked out a latest copy for xml security Java from svn trunk(1.4.3). But
ant test showed a few failures and it took me quite some time to figure them
out.
Here are a summary of issues I identified:
1. dependency on Sun JVM. javax.xml.crypto.test.KeySelectors use two
internal classes: sun
