RE: 'make install' for C++ 1.x on Solaris

2004-03-29 Thread Scott Cantor
> So no quick fix. I'm going to have to play around to find something > that works nicely. Thanks for looking into it, it's definitely working better with GNU install installed, but I did run into one other makefile bug that chokes that version. There's a duplicate mention of XSECConfig.hpp in s

Re: 'make install' for C++ 1.x on Solaris

2004-03-29 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Scott, First the good news. I can reproduce your problem by removing install on a system here. The bad news is that I have absolutely no idea why autoconf requires install-sh be in the src directory - it seem worse to use it rather than nothing! The "standard" X11 install-sh script is fairly

RE: 'make install' for C++ 1.x on Solaris

2004-03-26 Thread Scott Cantor
> Make install works on the Solaris 2.8 system that we have access to, but > I suspect that's because we have the GNU install (fileutils) on our > system. Probably so. I'll give it a try myself with that package installed. As long as there's a relatively reasonable way to get make install to work

Re: 'make install' for C++ 1.x on Solaris

2004-03-26 Thread Erwin van der Koogh
Make install works on the Solaris 2.8 system that we have access to, but I suspect that's because we have the GNU install (fileutils) on our system. We have a bunch of Solaris 2.8 systems here with and without GNU stuff installed. I can give it a shot here if you want. But I would need some detail

Re: 'make install' for C++ 1.x on Solaris

2004-03-26 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Scott, Make install works on the Solaris 2.8 system that we have access to, but I suspect that's because we have the GNU install (fileutils) on our system. I will install on a system with no native install tomorrow and see if that breaks things, because I suspect that's where the problem is. (

RE: 'make install' for C++ 1.x on Solaris

2004-03-25 Thread Scott Cantor
> I thought I tested this. > > Will have a look-see tonight and see what is wrong. On 2.8, I'm also getting failures in which the include tree isn't deep copied during the install. Maybe some newer version of some GNU-related package is needed? -- Scott

Re: 'make install' for C++ 1.x on Solaris

2004-03-25 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Scott, I thought I tested this. Will have a look-see tonight and see what is wrong. Cheers, Berin > Is it me, or is the install-sh stuff in the package broken on Solaris? > I get errors from missing copies of install-sh and have to manually > copy it from the root into each subdirect

"make install" for C++ 1.x on Solaris

2004-03-25 Thread Scott Cantor
Is it me, or is the install-sh stuff in the package broken on Solaris? I get errors from missing copies of install-sh and have to manually copy it from the root into each subdirectory, which is a serious PITA. -- Scott