I'll go ahead and check-in the patch.
Vishal
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Sounds like a good thing to me!
Vishal Mahajan wrote:
I would like to hear what other members on the list think about going
for this change.
Vishal
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Vishal,
+1 from me.
thanks,
dims
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 04:
Sounds like a good thing to me!
Vishal Mahajan wrote:
I would like to hear what other members on the list think about going
for this change.
Vishal
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Vishal,
+1 from me.
thanks,
dims
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 04:40:46 +, Vishal Mahajan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All:
Based
> I would like to hear what other members on the list think about going
> for this change.
>
> Vishal
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
+1 for me, It simplifies the code that is very good, and it seems to ease
the burden of supporting several JCE/JRE(which I don't have experience as
I always using sun
> I would like to hear what other members on the list think about going
> for this change.
I'm strongly in favor of it. We've been sort of fighting this mechanism and
having trouble with helping people that have unusual JCE requirements.
If I understand the change correctly, it will let people u
I would like to hear what other members on the list think about going
for this change.
Vishal
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Vishal,
+1 from me.
thanks,
dims
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 04:40:46 +, Vishal Mahajan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All:
Based on Sean's proposal I have prepared a patch (attached)
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Question: Are u suggesting that If the algName is not present in
config.xml then use "single-argument getInstance(algName)"??
No. I am proposing to remove the JCE/JCA algName mappings from config.xml and to
instead use the "single-argument getInstance(algName)" and rely on
Question: Are u suggesting that If the algName is not present in
config.xml then use "single-argument getInstance(algName)"??
-- dims
PS: we are still supporting 1.3/1.4 right?
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:44:33 -0400, Sean Mullan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, we have run into a seri
Hi,
Recently, we have run into a serious issue with the Apache XML Security
Java implementation due to the way it uses its own mechanism
(config.xml) to find JCA/JCE providers for different XML DSig or Enc
algorithm URIs instead of using the standard J2SE mechanism [1].
The issue involves findi
